Skip to content

Supper for a Song, Tamasin Day-Lewis

I wasn’t going to read this book, being acquainted with Ms Day-Lewis’s writing of yore for the Sunday supplements. In my mind I hear a hectoring, strident voice, talking about the fashionable issues: organic, sustainable, seasonal, Aga, farmhouse kitchen; listen to her Amazon video if you’d like to hear exactly what nightmare runs in my mind. Most of the other reviews talk about what “for a song” means to a woman of privilege, where economy means doing your own shopping in Harrod’s/Fortnum’s, and not sending the help out to do it.

It’s true that the principle of economy is spoiled by the little additions. It also seems that the book came up a little short, and a number of the recipes were flung together out of the larder and pantry at the last minute, and further supplemented by a few luxury recipes rather than parsimonious ones. Her simple tea bread is jazzed up with Earl Grey tea and Fortnum and Mason’s mixed dried fruits, but is otherwise identical to Mary Berry’s Bara Brith recipe. But she does start with the classic “how to get three meals out of a roast chicken”, and has a fair swathe of ways to use up left-over mashed potatoes.

This isn’t a book for people lacking kitchen skills: some of the recipes are complex: take a look at the bay, honey and lemon cake, for example; and you need to know how to prepare cake tins and make a cartouche. But she name checks the right people: Elizabeth David and Anna Del Conte, and comes up with authentic seeming Italian recipe pastiches. The photographs are mostly of the actually recipe mixtures (this isn’t as common as you might hope), although I did spot a couple of discrepancies, like a cake using what seemed to be fresh dates when the recipes calls for medjool dates.

I’ve cooked a few of these recipes in the past couple of days, and I am impressed by her combinations of flavours; not just on the page, but how they work out in practice. The sausage and mustard casserole with cabbage and chestnuts, for instance, works out to be rather more subtle than the blow with a sledge hammer that it reads as. Time and time again she uses chestnuts, chocolate, chick peas, ground almonds, chilis and the aforementioned mashed potatoes – some of my favourite things (ok, not the mash!).

Approach this book as a collection themed with an international peasant background, with a sure touch for flavour combinations, and you won’t be disappointed. If you do this, it’s probably a good idea to ignore the recipe introductions, and stick to the heart of the book, the recipes, instead. A proper table of contents would have been a good idea, too.

Tagged ,

Good Eats: The Early Years, Alton Brown

I am a big fan of the Good Eats show, even though my only access to it is via YouTube, and I have Alton Brown’s three previous books from the series. There are 80 episodes covered in this first installment of three books (not two, as the Product Description claims), each with a short discussion of the themes of the show, a couple of recipes (called applications in the book), and some quotes and trivia. The recipes have all been reworked, some substantially; a few that I have checked have been exactly as given in the shows. Recipes have been adjusted to use weights (hurray!) rather than cup measures, where it is appropriate.

If you are looking for a basic cookbook, then this isn’t it; but then, it doesn’t claim to be. If you want to dig out some recipe that you half remember from an episode, or just would like a souvenir of the shows, you’ll be very happy. I have made a number of the recipes; most work out very well, but some have quirks that give inedible results (for me) – I’ll refer you to p156 and the “Duck!” recipe – which has become known in my household as “rubber duck” for an example. But I should emphasise that most recipes work well, especially the baking recipes.

Tagged ,

iPhone app – Huddle

Huddle is a network of Online workspaces that brings project management software, online collaboration and document sharing together.

I’m putting this up as the support URL pro tem for Huddle.

Tagged , ,

Getting Online – how hard can it be?

I have a hate/hate relationship with BT Openworld.  Let’s be clear; I have no choice but to use them, as they have access points at all the places I visit and might need a connection.  All the old coffee shop access points in my area have been converted to BT Openworld, taking them at a stroke from free to expensive.  From the café’s viewpoint, an access point should surely only be a cheap box dropped onto their existing network, only a minor expense, but BT must be doing some hard sell about how difficult it is to maintain and secure, and selling them a separate line with some magical remote configuration options at a price, which requires a special redirect to a log in web page – showing how complexity just escalates if you ignore the obvious solution.

So take an iPod.  Imagine that you’re in a café somewhere, which happens to have a BT Openworld access point, and you have a burning need to connect – but you don’t have a BT subscription.  Pre-3.0, you’d open Safari to any page, you’d be told to pick an access point, and you’d be redirected to the BT login page.  From there you would have been able to navigate to anywhere BT would allow you, which would have included all their subscription plan pages.

But with 3.0, when you select the access point, you are taken to a special log on page within Settings.  For some reason your ability to navigate from there is restricted; possibly intentionally, or possibly by some sort of time out.  Whichever it is, you won’t have enough time to sign up for a subscription (unlimited time at BT Openworld access points is £12.50 per month, minimum contract 18 months, and you have to give multiple addresses as a credit reference – despite having given them your credit card details as well, which I consider to be needlessly intrusive).

The solution to this problem is to sign up beforehand – which is stupid.  Next problem is that I couldn’t get through their payment pages using Safari, on iPod or Mac OS X (Firefox on Mac OS X worked, in the end).  When you succeed, you get two separate emails sent to your mail address, as well as a page showing the user name and password, which you really need to write down, on paper.

So why write it on paper?  Surely you could copy and paste the strings directly from email, assuming that you had a connection while taking out the subscription?  Well, if you have this special log in screen, if you switch out of it, say to mail, to copy it down, you lose the connection and have to restart – and with two fields to copy, that’s not going to fly.

You could copy them both into a Note, on the same line, and remember how long the password/user name is, then copy and paste it into the two fields.  Password fields are obscured, so you have to remember the length.  If you gave up on that (I did) and are retyping from a scrap of paper, you’d better remember that the user name field is going to be auto-capitalised, and the log in page doesn’t show you an error message when it fails (Safari, JavaScript validation buttons, take your pick).

It is all too hard.  Part of the problem is Apple’s, who haven’t thought through the login process very well for the proportion of their users with iPod touch rather than iPhone, and making a retrograde change to the process; but it’s mostly BT’s fault for making it actively hard for people to buy their product.

Tagged ,

The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, L Frank Baum

It has taken me some time to get around to reading this book – close to 40 years, if I remember that far back clearly (which mostly I do). I remember seeing the great film classic version when I was young, many times; to be honest, it didn’t really grip me, although the switch into Technicolor was just as much of a wow for me as it must have been to those early audiences, and “Over the Rainbow” was also a key moment. But the Munchkins, flying monkeys, wicked witches didn’t insert themselves into my dreams as much as they did to most Americans. I tried to read it a few years later, when at boarding school – one of the benefits of an old library – but I found the turn of century American voice of the author much harder to deal with than the equivalent Victorians who I had come to enjoy.

What moved me to restart reading after so long was a growing appreciation that it really was a classic; and Baum wrote so many sequels, there must have been something to it; and watching a wicked witch/flying monkeys gag on Two and a Half Men, which was my trigger.

The plot is remarkably close to that of the film; common now in an era of slavish adaptations, where the most successful movie adaptations are those closest to the book, but exceedingly rare before Lord of the Rings/Harry Potter. There was the slight conceit of having the Lion, Tin Man and Scarecrow played by Dorothy’s friends from Kansas, which wasn’t taken from the book. Then a lot of repeated, very similar events where each of the companions does basically the same thing in different parts of Oz.

My overall take on the book is very good; it’s a fun children’s story written some time ago, with some very vivid characters. But every moment I expect some sort of missionary to leap out from behind a rock; that comes partly from the chapbook moralising on loan from Pilgrim’s Progress, but I also catch a whiff of the Kellogg about Baum. That’s not a problem to enjoying the story, just something that I can appreciate now that I know a little more about the background of that era.

Tagged

The Compleat Angler, Isaak Walton

Anglers talk of this book with reverence, or did so when I was in my teens.  Back then I can recall taking a look, and finding it rather impenetrable, written in an archaic style.

All of this is still true, but I found it an interesting read none the less.  There is certainly a lot of talk of different fishes, from salmon and trout through pike and perch to eel, roach, tench, carp, chub, minnows and “sticklebugs”.  For each he gives their habit, how to fish for them, and even how to cook them – and he has many recipes for the most coarse fish.

The real interest for me was in how accurate his observations can be, contrasted against how he had no idea of what happens to (what we now know to be) migratory birds during the winter, and the ideas of generation of fish from mud and slime, or geese from barnacles.  Some things, however, never change; he describes the chemical dosing of bait to better attract fish, and the secrecy of top anglers as to exactly how they construct their bait.

The book is structured as a dialogue between two men, known as Piscator (the narrator) and Venator, his student.  Complete with interludes where they sing songs in the inn, and donate the lesser of their catch to local farmer’s wives.  The initial chapter is more formal, as these two discuss the relative merits of their sports with two others in a structured style.

This style makes it hard to read, but you can pick up a feel for his life and nature from hints that drop – so many references to his angler friends who are now deceased, and his happiness and content to be, as he claims, of modest means and content with his lot.

Tagged

Bad Science, Ben Goldacre

I picked this up in Waterstones, after a quick browse.  It is more or less a book version of Ben’s blog, which in turn is related to his column in the Guardian.  It’s a reasonably entertaining exposé of newspaper journalism concerning health stories.

The main topics covered are: nutritionists, MMR, and homeopathy.  In order: he dislikes them, stupid scare story by ignorant journalists, and it doesn’t work – at all.  There is some exposition explaining the wonders of the placebo effect and the workings of newspaper publishers.  He is also considerably influenced by good old C P Snow’s two cultures idea.  In other words, newspapers are run by arts graduates who prefer authority figures, and ignore educated science graduates, who understand scientific theory and are capable of reading papers and interpreting them.

As a literate science graduate myself, I can sympathise to a large degree.  However, interpreting papers is a damn sight harder than he makes out, although he does at least give strong references to two other books that are medical course textbooks on the topic.

Ben also writes somewhat as if he has a chip on his shoulder about this, and is rather inclined to commit the same sins: referencing a paper and citing conclusions from it as authority, and not always presenting the results as he would have the newspapers do.

I can’t and won’t disagree with anything he presents – I strongly suspect he is absolutely correct in his main themes, even though his writing style leaves me a very little bit cautious about accepting all his conclusions.  Which is no doubt as he would prefer it.

Currently reading: The Compleat Angler, Isaac Walton.

Tagged

A Princess of Mars, Edgar Rice Burroughs

This is the first in a series of posts reviewing books, as I read them.  Older book reviews here are mostly archives of reviews that I have posted to Amazon, some for computing books, others for cookery books.

I first read A Princess of Mars in my early teens (I was possibly 12 at the time, so not-quite-teens), while living away from home at boarding school.  I think I heard about it somewhere, and I know that I had read some of the Tarzan series much earlier (pre-teens).  It had a profound effect on me, alongside Robert Heinlein at the same time.  It was as a result of reading this that I took up fencing, for one thing.

It is a simple book, not very long when compared with current novels, told in first person by John Carter, from Virginia, once a Captain in the Confederate army, and at the start of the book a miner in Arizona.  One thing that I didn’t pick up on my first reading was the Southern voice in which it is told, something that I had never heard (or read) before.  There’s no point going into the wrong science – which was reasonably current when the book was written, at least as far as the landscape of Mars is concerned.  The scaling effect of gravity on John Carter’s strength, and his ability to jump, was perhaps more obviously wrong.

If you haven’t read this, then you should.  The first three of the series, which would include Gods of Mars and Warlord of Mars, are the essentials that anyone should have read.

An interesting diversion is how I got hold of it.  I had been looking for a copy of the trilogy in a desultory way for a number of years, and would happily have paid for a fine print edition, if such a thing could be found (highly unlikely).  I had gone so far as to order a single paperback edition from Amazon, which after many months ended up unsourceable.  Then I had been checking out book reader apps on my iPod touch, and formed a firm preference for Stanza over BookShelfLT.  At the time I had to reject it, despite the better reading controls, because BookShelfLT could give me access to the Baen Free Library, which had a couple of books I wanted to read – and weren’t in print on Amazon.

So, some time later, I found an upgrade to Stanza, which let me access Baen, and I was very happy.  I also discovered that Stanza had included a lot more online libraries, and found A Princess of Mars that way.

Tagged

iPhone app – HandyPoints

This is the draft of the App Store info page:

HandyPoints is an easy-to-use points calculator which makes it simple for you to work out the points score for any food item, and helps you on your journey to your goal weight.   Use HandyPoints to help you diet responsibly.

Just put in the right values and tap Calculate.  To start again, tap Clear or just shake the iPhone to erase.

Did you know that for the USA we use a different formula than in other countries to calculate points?  Most foods in the USA show dietary fiber values on their nutritional information packaging, whereas foods in other countries show saturated fat instead.  So the USA uses a formula based on calories, total fat and fiber; non-US countries use a formula based on calories and saturated fat content.

So HandyPoints looks at your current locale and decides whether to use the US or the Rest of World points formula initially. You can change this in your application Preferences (tap the Info button) if you want.  You can also choose to work with kJoules instead of kCalories.

Sometimes it can be good for your diet plan to know that a chocolate muffin really scores 6.8 points even if you have to enter it into your tracker as 7.   HandyPoints shows you the correct points to put into your tracker, and also shows you the exact non-rounded answer just for information.

This program was not developed, supported or endorsed by Weight Watchers or WeightWatchers.

Now the background: Liz has been following Weight Watchers for a couple of months, and needed a quick calculator for her iPhone.  The ones on the App Store had some pretty mixed reviews, and she found the ones she tried inaccurate for some cases.  So Liz has been my main beta tester for this.  She has put a lot of effort into reviewing the user interface, and checking (and double checking) all the calculations.  The app is free, and will remain so – it also has a very simple (functional) user interface, as befits such a simple app.

Now for some details about the app itself: yes, the intention is to calculate points using the Weight Watchers system.  They use one algorithm for the USA, requiring calories, total fat, and fibre, as that is what they can see on the nutritional information panels; and a different one for the rest of the world, using calories, saturated fat, but no fibre.  They also round differently – the USA rounds to the nearest point, the rest of the world to the nearest half point.  So that’s how we work it out, and we have checked the results against various web sites of food manufacturers that list points values for their products.

The UI is intentionally as simple as we could make it, which means non-glitzy; I apologise for not making it flashy and glittery, preferring to keep it in accord with human interface guidelines and functional.  I make my own custom UITableViewCells, with label and text field, with a standard keyboard attached.  Unfortunately, there isn’t an option for a numeric keyboard, so I had to use the (rather lame) numbers and punctuation keyboard.  The numeric keypad that you will sometimes see is intended for numeric only input , such as for PINs- no decimal points.  When you return in one field, it calculates using the current input and moves to the next field, clearing it for entry; on the final field, the keyboard drops down when you enter.  The calculate button is really unnecessary, but it’s there for comfort; a user can feel that they know what to do.  The clear button also isn’t essential, and exists to give the user the impression of a transactional structure to their calculations.  I don’t support rotation, either – it doesn’t feel right in landscape mode (or upside down).  

I have tested this with all variations; permitting rotation, entry into a form rather than table view, a clear button, keyboards dropping at the end of each field.  The version that I am releasing is the one that worked the best for all testers.

The App Store submission should go off in the next couple of days; I realise that things can take a little while to arrive after that.

Please post any support requests or other comments on HandyPoints as comments to this post.  And if anyone likes it a lot…

Tagged

Xcode tips – autocomplete and lookup

There are a few simple key combinations that help a lot when using Xcode – I don’t mean just the emacs key bindings (which are worth a post all on their own), but autocomplete and lookups.  I suffer badly from forgetting these keystrokes when I switch between Xcode and Eclipse (and TextMate and all sorts of other tools).

First the autocomplete key stroke, which everyone knows:

  • Tab – enters the highlighted completion; but then:
  • Esc – pops up a selector for all possible completions for the current context.

Next the lookups:

  • Alt- double click – looks up the current word in the Documentation window;
  • Cmd-double click – looks up the definition (often in a system .h file) for the current word.

Something important I almost forgot: the right click menu inside the Xcode editor brings up a useful list of tools, including all the above options.

That’s all; short and sweet.

Tagged